Wednesday, October 10, 2007
Strongest Argument
My strongest argument is definitely that student drug testing violates the 4th amendment, which is reasonable search and seizure. The Supreme Court rules that schools can drug test students without a reasonable search and seizure which is unfair because everyone is equal. You can't feel that someone who say is 32 years old and someone who is 16 year old has different rights. Schools feel they need to protect their students by drug testing them, when in fact you don't. If you run your school the right way there is no need to make someone take a drug test because of suspicion.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
There is a difference between a person who is 32 years old and one who is 16 years old. It is called the age of majority or the age of consent. A person who is not a legal adult does not have the same set of rights as a person who is over that legal threshold.
What do you propose the "right" way to run a school is that would not require drug testing with suspicion?
Post a Comment